Pietro Orlando Fellin vs Mats Rosenkranz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 09:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Orlando Fellin vs M. Rosenkranz

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fellin 1 - 0 Rosenkranz
They have played 1 sets in total, with Pietro Orlando Fellin winning 0 and Mats Rosenkranz winning 1. The last match between Pietro Orlando Fellin and Mats Rosenkranz was at the Hersonissos 3 Challenger, 13-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 5-7 def..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fellin | 1 |
| Rosenkranz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Hersonissos 3 Challenger(08-13-25)
P. O. Fellin vs M. Rosenkranz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,755 |
| 61.66% (119-74) | Career Total W/L | 51.60% (322-302) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. O. Fellin vs M. Rosenkranz Match Preview:
- Comparing second serve efficiencies, Rosenkranz boasts a slightly better performance by winning 47.03% of points, compared to Fellin's 40.92%.
- In terms of return games, Fellin has an edge by winning 45.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosenkranz claims 43.06%.
- Rosenkranz struggles against first serves, capturing only 21.37% of returns compared to Fellin's more impressive 29.34%.
- Can pressure situations reveal a pattern? Yes, with Rosenkranz saving 55.86% of breakpoints, he seems more resilient than Fellin, who saves 48.24%.
- Overall performance over the past year favors Fellin, who won 71.23% of his matches, against Rosenkranz's 61.04% win rate.
- Surface performance shows Rosenkranz is more effective on Grass with a 60% win rate, while Fellin excels on Hard courts with 72% wins.
- Analyzing the competition level, both players frequent Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Fellin slightly outperforming Rosenkranz with 72.73% wins versus 68.29%.
- Quality of opponents faced is similar: Rosenkranz's average opponent ranked 385.52, close to Fellin's average of 382.23.
- When matches extend to a deciding set, Rosenkranz prevails 60% of the time, whereas Fellin closes such matches 53% of the time.
- Breakpoint conversion rates are highly advantageous to Fellin, who converts 39.47% of his opportunities, significantly surpassing Rosenkranz's 26.47%.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Assessing both players' recent performance and strengths, certain trends emerge. Rosenkranz demonstrates a slight advantage in second serve points but struggles significantly with first serve returns.
Fellin possesses an adept returning ability, particularly on first serves, granting him a potential edge in breaking Rosenkranz's serve. His proficiency on hard courts also aligns well with the upcoming match conditions.
While both players show similar resilience under pressure and in crucial deciding sets, Fellin's superior performance metrics, particularly in breakpoint conversions, suggest a strategic advantage.
Based on this comparative analysis, Fellin is projected as the likely winner in their upcoming tennis match, given his comprehensive strengths in several critical areas.
Pietro Orlando Fellin vs Mats Rosenkranz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. O. Fellin vs M. Rosenkranz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 5 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:16 | Average Match Time | 1:22:16 |
| 44% (20/45) | 1st Serve % | 70% (26/37) |
| 80% (16/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (21/26) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/5) |
| 35% (13/37) | Return Points Win % | 31% (14/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. O. Fellin Recent Matches Played
M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played

P. O. Fellin vs M. Rosenkranz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.66% (119/74) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.60% (322/302) |
| 59.35% (254/174) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.52% (726/711) |
| 54.02% (2148/1828) | Games Win/Loss | 50.79% (7117/6895) |
| 70.30% (71/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.59% (66/82) |
| 54.32% (44/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.12% (112/116) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.94% (135/98) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 270 | Aces Total | 3997 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 294 | Total Double Faults | 1999 |
| 1:15:39 | Average Match Time | 1:24:35 |
| 343.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 462.59 |
| 61% (4929/8134) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22152/36860) |
| 66% (3230/4929) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (16520/22152) |
| 50% (1615/3205) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7065/14708) |
| 46% (408/888) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1216/3145) |
| 43% (3606/8399) | Return Points Win % | 37% (13792/37452) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Challenger W/L | 46.70% (85/97) |
| 63.37% (109/63) | Futures W/L | 54.13% (236/200) |
| 62% (117/190) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (315/613) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 57% (24/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (116/236) |
| 58% (26/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (110/197) |
| 92% (115/106) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (313/265) |
| 8% (115/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (313/48) |
| 15% (78/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (310/57) |